1) Who gave you permission to repost my blog on your site anyway? They have a name for that, oh yeah, it's called plagiarism
2) Why the hell are you people so angry? Who knew Jennifer Aniston had such a following and that it included a bunch of angry British people!?!? If you don't agree with me, that's fine... just chill out with the name calling... "loon", "stupid". It's poor practice. It has been my experience that usually people that deliver these types of aggressive and unwarranted insults have all types of problems of their own (and I work in a psychiatric facility so I'm pretty comfortable with this observation). In addition, guess all you very intelligent individuals missed the reference in the title of the blog you call so "stupid", huh?? Oh and by the way, for those of you writing "who cares about these people" blah blah blah, let's not forget you read my article on a celebrity gossip website. That's a bit hypocritical don't you think??
3) For those of you that continue to make remarks about Brad vs. Jen vs. Angelina- you all missed the point. The point is that it takes a strong man to appreciate a strong woman. Pitt and Jolie are what we call an example. I thought this would be an easier illustration of that point, rather than telling a story about my friend Bob, and his ex-wife Sally, and his new parter Jane- since because of the media, we all know about these people. Frankly, I don't think that point was so hard to miss. Unless of course....
4) I am posting my comments to your very helpful feedback here, because your site conveniently wont let me register.
5) Thanks for reading! suckkkaaaaaaaaaaassssssssssssss
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Here is my thing, if someone has a bunch of money, they should not be highly praised for being humanitarians. Simply because some hoard their money does not mean that those who don't should be put on a pedestal, they are merely doing what is morally required of the monetarily fortunate. So, if you want some real humanitarian hotties you might find some better examples in the lower rungs on society.
OK. That is a VERY good point (to an extent). Yes, people that have lots of money should give a lot to worthy causes- and not be praised for being humanitarians just because they have big wallets. However, as we all know, many rich celebrities do, as you point out, hoard their money. In addition, among those that do not hoard their money and donate generously, they still don't trek through dangerous conflict zones and deliver aid personally- which is why I was praising Jolie (not because of her financial donations, though she does donate 1/3 of her income and that is a lot). However, like I said, I completely agree with you that more celebs should donate more money. Perhaps though, with all the positive press Brangelina get for their work, other celebs will be influenced to donate. Who cares if Brangelina gets some other celeb to donate $1 mil to a good cause. This is a case where the means certainly justify the ends.
Just say no to blog drama. I myself used to engage in LJ flame wars, until I realized there were vastly better things I could do with my time than wasting it arguing with some troll that lives in their mother's basement. Especially on the internet where people act even more obnoxious than they normally would because of semi-anonymity, it's usually better not to dignify someone's stupidity with any kind of response at all. Otherwise you're just inviting more of it.
Another thing to note, when your success is directly linked to public image, I find it hard to trust anything you do........
Post a Comment